Menu close

Inexplicable pay gap between men and women in finance: "It makes me both furious and exhausted"

There is a considerable difference between what men and women earn in the financial sector. About half is explained by differences in job functions whereas 7.1 per cent is inexplicable. “That's 100 per cent unacceptable,” says the vice president of Finansforbundet.

3. Mar 2026
6 min
English / Dansk

Women earn less than men in the financial sector. 

On average, women employed in banks and mortgage credit institutions earn 14.4 per cent less than their male colleagues.  

Some differences in pay are explained by differences in jobs, responsibilities and profiles. But even when this is taken into account, we are left with an inexplicable gender pay gap in the financial sector of 7.1 per cent. 

This is indicated by an analysis made by HBS Economics on behalf of Finansforbundet. 

"It's 100 per cent unacceptable that men are paid 14.4 per cent more than women. Women look at their payslip every month and see pay inequality. They perceive this as unfair, and it affects their possibilities in life. I realise that some of it is due to different job functions. But there's no explanation for why this type of inequality has not been rectified long ago. It makes me both furious and exhausted," says Steen Lund Olsen, Vice President of Finansforbundet. 

(Artiklen fortsætter efter boksen)
Steen Lund Olsen
"It's 100 per cent unacceptable that men are paid 14.4 per cent more than women," says Vice President of Finansforbundet, Steen Lund Olsen. Photo: Mathias Eis

 A structural issue 

According to the analysis, part of the pay differential is explained by the fact that men and women perform different job functions, and that men to a greater extent than women have staff responsibility.

Conversely, women have, on average, more work experience than men, which pulls in the other direction.  

But although 7.3 per cent of the pay gap is accounted for, the difference is still problematic, maintains Klaus Mosekjær Madsen, Senior Economist. 

"It's obvious that the sector has a structural problem when men hold the highest-paid jobs," he says. 

The analysis takes into account a wide range of factors, including fields of education, educational length, work experience, absence, region, working hours, staff responsibilities, maternity/paternity leave, sickness absence and job changes. But the inexplicable pay gap of 7.1 per cent still remains, and, according to Klaus Mosekjær Madsen, that's precisely why the result is important. 

“When a significant pay gap remains after such a detailed comparison, it indicates a genuine equal-pay problem,” he says. 

"If the sector had worked as methodically with equal pay as it does with compliance and the bottom line, the pay gap would have been closed long ago."
- Steen Lund Olsen, Vice President of Finansforbundet

Far from good enough 

HBS Economics performed a similar analysis in 2024. Since then, the overall pay gap has decreased by 1.4 percentage points, while the inexplicable pay gap was 7.1 per cent then too. 

Steen Lund Olsen is pleased with the small improvement, but, in his opinion, it is far from good enough when the inexplicable pay gap remains substantial and unchanged from Finansforbundet's last analysis in 2024. 

"The sector has built up an entire compliance army to meet regulations on money laundering, GDPR and sustainability. But when it comes to legislation on equal pay, the troops appear to be on leave.

If the sector had worked as methodically with equal pay as it does with compliance and the bottom line, the pay gap would have been closed long ago," he claims. 

Pay gap grows wider in step with management responsibility 

Diving deeper into the analysis, we also see that women enter the sector at a lower pay level than men. 

Among graduates, there is an inexplicable pay gap of 1.8 per cent. 
At the same time, the analysis shows that the difference typically becomes greater as you move up the hierarchy. 

The pay gap is generally most substantial in specialised and highly-paid functions. As an example, the pay gap is 17 per cent in staff and specialist functions, of which 7 per cent cannot be explained. 

In addition, the pay gap increases as you move up through the management layers. In top management, the pay gap is 20 percent of which 11 per cent is inexplicable. 

"Some may think 'OK, a 1.8 per cent pay gap for graduates – is that worth the bother?'. But inequality tends to grow. And our conclusion is that such inequality continues to affect women throughout the years. The pay gap becomes a bitter travelling companion taking up more and more space. And it's most significant when women reach management level,” says Steen Lund Olsen. 

New rules on the way 

In June, a new EU directive on pay transparency will enter into force. This means that specific requirements will be introduced for information on pay in job advertisements, prohibition from asking questions about previous salary during job interviews and reporting of gender pay gaps for companies with more than 100 employees. 

"We need action. This year, the Danish Equal Pay Act turns 50, but we still haven't achieved equal pay. That's insane. We know from research that transparency about pay reduces pay inequality. 
Therefore, we urgently request that the politicians who are currently conducting election campaigns implement the new EU rules on pay transparency in Danish law as soon as they are back in parliament," he says. And he also has a message for the business sector: 

"An equally urgent request is made to companies about seizing the new rules and taking them seriously. The new transparency rules are not a bureaucratic monster. They're a tool for fighting inequality."

Employers: A pay gap does not in itself reflect an equal pay issue  

At Finance Denmark/Employer, CEO Morten Schønning Madsen emphasises that achieving equal pay for the same work or work of equal value is a key priority for the banks.  

"However, a pay gap does not in itself reflect an equal pay issue. The pay gap largely reflects the fact that, on average, men and women in the sector serve different functions, have different management responsibilities and different career profiles, just as the analysis may not have taken certain company-specific factors into account," he replies in a written response. 

In terms of the inexplicable pay differential, Morten Schønning Madsen emphasises that the report itself points out how the unexplained part may be a result of, for example, individual performance, efficiency, unregistered overtime and career priorities. 

"Employees within the same job function may, moreover, have very different tasks, responsibilities and competencies. The categorisation into job functions also implies, in itself, that certain explanatory factors cannot be measured, such as qualifications and performance. So even according to the report itself, the 7.1 per cent does not constitute documentation of gender-based pay inequality," says Morten Schønning Madsen. 

Klaus Mosekjær Madsen, Senior Economist, disagrees.  

“It's convenient to claim that pay gaps are caused by all sorts of things. They may be. But that's precisely why we've carried out a register-based, researched equal pay analysis that breaks down the pay gap and tests the explanations one by one: job function, responsibilities, education, experience and other measurable factors,” he says and continues: 

“When those factors are excluded from the calculation, there's still a pay gap of 7.1 per cent. If Finance Denmark/Employer believes that the explanation lies in qualifications, efficiency or individual performance, they're effectively claiming that women in comparable jobs generally perform about seven per cent worse than men. We don't believe so. That assumption seems, to say the least, difficult to take seriously," he says. 

(Artiklen fortsætter efter boksen)

Employer responsibility? 

The newsletter Finans also asked Morten Schønning Madsen whether employers have a responsibility for adjusting the pay differential. To that he replies: 

"Employers definitely have a responsibility for ensuring that pay is determined solely based on objective criteria with gender playing no role at all." However, gross differences in pay caused by structural circumstances such as gender-segregated educational and career choices and other cultural aspects cannot be imposed on individual employers and individual salary contracts.” 

Latest news